SummaryIn Allianz v. BLV Ascend, the North Carolina Business Court (Chief Judge Michael Robinson) delivers a clean, practical ruling on a somewhat over-lawyered problem: whether a plaintiff needs court permission to dismiss a guaranty claim—and whether doing so might jeopardize an already-in-place receivership.

The short answer: no and no.

Summary:

In Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP v. Muntjan, the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and held that a series of informal emails satisfied the statute of frauds for a guaranty of another’s debt.

Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol30/iss1/5

Summary

In Cournoyer v. Schamens (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2026), the Bankruptcy Court delivered a blunt reminder that discovery is not optional—even for pro se debtors. Faced with more than 400 days of noncompliance, repeated violations of court orders, and what it characterized as a pattern of bad faith and dilatory conduct, the court struck the debtor’s answer and entered default judgment denying discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2), (3), and (4).

Summary:

Parrott v. Yeh is another chapter in the ongoing effort to unwind transactions tied to the collapse of entities associated with Greg Lindberg—this time through the lens of a Chapter 7 Trustee exercising core avoidance powers under the Bankruptcy Code.

Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol30/iss1/17

INTRODUCTION:

Summary:

In Goddard v. Burnett, the Fourth Circuit affirmed what many bankruptcy judges (especially in the Eastern Disttrict of North Carolina) have been signaling for years: the mechanical safe harbor of § 1325(b) does not displace the equitable backbone of Chapter 13—good faith.

Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol30/iss1/13

INTRODUCTION: