Summary:

The Western District of North Carolina (Judge Volk, sitting by designation) issued a consolidated Memorandum Opinion and Order denying attempts by asbestos claimants in Bestwall and Aldrich Pump/Murray Boiler to take an interlocutory appeal challenging the bankruptcy courts’ refusal to dismiss the Texas Two-Step cases for bad faith.

Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5798042

Abstract:

Summary:

In a detailed but pragmatic opinion, Chief Judge Catherine Eagles offers a tidy roadmap for mortgage-servicing litigation in the Middle District — clarifying what sticks at the pleading stage (loss-mitigation fee violations, RESPA damages, UDTPA claims) and what gets tossed to the curb (negligence, joint venture fantasies, and the perennial “they threatened foreclosure!” count that courts treat like the boy who cried wolf).

Summary:

In In re Lombrano, Judge Kahn confronted the all-too-common BAPCPA problem of repeat filings colliding head-on with the automatic stay provisions. Ms. Lombrano—pro se—had filed three bankruptcy cases in under five months, two Chapter 7s (one dismissed for filing defects and jurisdictional issues, the next for nonpayment of the fee) followed by this Chapter 13.

Summary:

Judge Warren’s latest sanctions order reads like a greatest-hits compilation of the Eastern District’s prior encounters with bankruptcy document forgery—Wilds, Purdy, and now Williams—but with one glaring distinction: unlike Ms. Sugar, whose saga wound its way to the Fourth Circuit and back on the strength of a plausible (and ultimately successful) reliance on counsel argument, Deja Williams had no attorney to blame but herself.

Available at:  https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol29/iss1/19

Abstract/Introduction:

Available at:  https://ssrn.com/abstract=5647631 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5647631

Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5641971 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5641971

Summary:

In In re Peters, Judge Kahn addressed a  recurring question: when Chapter 13 debtors propose to pay unsecured claims in full under §1325(b)(1)(A), must those creditors also receive post-petition interest?

Summary: